Writers Chat 60: Greg Dinner on “A Requiem for Hania” (Ogham & Dabar Books: Clare, 2022)

Cover of “A Requiem for Hania” showing sepia photograph of railway tracks with ice on them and a forest in the distance

Greg, You are very welcome to my WRITERS CHAT series. Congratulations on your third novel, A Requiem for Hania (Ogham & Dabar Books: Clare, 2022). Let’s start with the structure. A Requiem for Hania spans three generations, continents and perspectives. You bring us to 1942, 1968 and 2006, all significant political, cultural, and of course, personal events in this epic story. How difficult was it for you to form this complex story of identity and family into a coherent structure?

GD: It took many years to find the structure I needed, and the reasons for how I chose to do so. Firstly you need to understand the genesis of the project.  I come out of the film world.  A Polish actress I was friendly with came to visit us in London in 2014.  Having a cockeyed sense of humour, I was teasing her one day that she was so neurotic, she reminded me of my own family—therefore she should have been Jewish (I’m both sides of this equation, particularly the neurotic part, so I almost get away with such jokes.)  We had a good laugh at this.  Then many weeks later, my friend rang me with a story she thought I should hear.  She’d gone to the Baltic Sea with her family to celebrate her Grandmother’s 90th birthday.  My friend was telling them about me, about my teasing comments.  Her Grandmother became quite angry, wanting to know how I could say such a terrible thing, not seeing the joke. 

The next morning the Grandmother gathered the family together to tell them that in fact–she was Jewish:  she’d been in the Warsaw Ghetto, escaped, changed her name, identity, everything, and never told a soul—not husband, family, the State, no one, until that moment

Thus the joke ended and ultimately my journey, my obsession with the meaning of such revelation in the light of my own family background, began. 

Then a second story:  I met my wife Annie in the late 1970s when I was living in Paris and she was the manager of well-known bookshop Shakespeare and Company on the Left Bank.  Yes, Joyce comes into it but that’s another story.  Before Annie had started at the bookshop she’d been an au pair for two architects—the wife German, the husband Polish and Jewish.  We all remain close to this day.  I was always fascinated by his story:  he’d left Warsaw in 1968 and was not allowed to return until the Wall came down in 1989.  Warsaw 1968 was a time of student uprising and protests, although as I learned when researching the reasons for this were very different than I’d assumed.  Now this era was also the time of my own coming of age.  I too am a child of the late 1960s/70s.  I wanted to bring this period, and the Cold War, into the story of the Warsaw Ghetto triggered by my friend’s Grandmother, as well as a more contemporary story.  But I did not know how to tie them into one another.

Then in 2018 my father passed away.  I spent many weeks at his bedside in Colorado, sitting with him night after night because I suffer badly from jetlag.  I would pass those nights, hour upon hour, quietly listening to music as he slept…. And it was through this emotional upheaval that I found a way to structure the material, how to tell the story, and what would be at its centre.

That would be music.  The tie that binds.

I’ve always been drawn to structure and how to tell a story.  Structure has long obsessed me.  And in ‘Hania’ I found Voice when structuring the book as a requiem in both its story and its storytelling.  Thus the novel is structured not with chapters but as in musical form, with a Prelude, Four Movements and a Coda—each section with an appropriate Latinate description.  Music is all.  By utilizing this as central to the stories and themes I needed to tell, and how to tell them, I found the structure I needed.  The structure allowed me to tie together disparate stories and characters over three generations and to develop its central themes of identity, the search for self, the need to witness. 

SG: Wow that is a fascinating story – I love how it began and then seemed to build upon itself, the impact of truth-telling, death/grief (sympathies on the death of your father); the circularity of it all. Of course, I am glad that you talked a little about the musical form, as you say, the book “as a requiem in both its story and its storytelling.” It works beautifully and your writing style often echoes the character-narrative, in particular, when trauma is involved. For example, Hania’s narrative in the Warsaw Ghetto veers from almost chatty to staccato. Can you talk about the importance of syntax to the story telling?

GD: Whether in screenwriting or fiction I’ve always explored ways to tell a story and how can it reflect the themes I want to explore.  In ‘Hania’ for example a central theme is what it means to witness, and more importantly, especially to Jews post-Holocaust, the metaphorical concept of Bearing Witness.  It’s a concept I can talk at length about.  In ‘Hania’ this is partly reflected in the use of witnesses.  Each movement begins with a witness commenting on and then participating in story.  I needed to find the language of these witnesses that might be the syntax of the ‘movement’ as well as that character’s own specific syntax.  Thus the witness of the First Movement, a psychoanalyst, writes in the language of Freud’s notes about his patients.  In the Second Movement the ‘witness’ is a security agent secretly taping and following the primary character, so his language needs to be from official reports submitted to a superior—a style I copied from German Stasi files I’ve viewed; in the Third Movement the witness is a young Israeli researcher who writes short letters home to his family, thus the epistolary style; in the final movement a Conductor Maestro’s manager gives a lecture to Juilliard students, and I used a lecture syntax that I use in my own talks and lectures. 

So too is the case with direct syntax, with the grammatical structure of language and style in the narrative itself.  I’ve said that Music is the story, and the storytelling.  I wanted elements of music to be reflected in narrative style, replete with language at times staccato or legato, andante or da capo, with cadence and rhythm, with melody and harmony.  The language of music and the words of the characters become one.  I’m very conscious of what I’m doing.  It’s also why in particular I use repetition often, as indeed does musical composition:  repetition with the slightest deviation, as if circling around and around in trying to discover some element of ‘truth’ in narrative.  I am sometimes criticized for it.  But I’m doing such with intent.  In music I’ve been deeply influenced particularly for this project by Phillip Glass and Max Richter, let alone Bach.  If you want to understand why I insist on repetition of story and syntax, listen to Glass.  And look at the variations in syntax, of sentence structure, as a form of musical score.  It’s what I mean when I say that music is not only central to story itself—it is as a reader discovers by the end of the book—but to storytelling.  One reflects the other.

SG: And I also think that the witnessing is two-fold – those recording and those experiencing. I have to say, it sounds complex – and it is, to write and deconstruct as we are doing – but it is not this way for the reader. Writing, creating and recording all play a vital and life saving role in the novel. Do you think that part of what A Requiem for Hania is doing is also recording the importance of literature and the arts in helping us remember and talk about the hurt we continue to inflict on each other, in the name of ideologies?

GD: As an executive in film, then as screenwriter and teacher, we always talked of ‘Voice’ and what that means.  The personal seeking the universal; the universal defining the personal.  Voice is everything, what I always seek.  I refer to Leonard Bernstein.  In talking about Music he said: “Music can name the unnameable and communicate the unknowable.”.  He also said: “This will be our reply to violence: to make music more intensely, more beautifully, more devotedly than ever before.”  I would expand beyond music into art itself.  To its creation.  In the story I tell, yes, writing, creating, acting, recording all explore and give Voice.  And help me to answer against the violence not only of the past, of the Warsaw Ghetto, or the anti-Semitic government-instigated violence of Poland in 1968, but to answer against the violence of today.  For me, ‘A Requiem For Hania’ is not simply about the Warsaw Ghetto and the Holocaust, is not simply a Jewish story.  Rather it is my own desperate need to look at my world and the work I have done and still do, from the Holocaust to Vietnam, from Bosnia to Rwanda, from Syria and Afghanistan to Ukraine—very much to Ukraine—and say–no.  And say I Bear Witness.  In Hebrew, alliterated, you see these words often, particularly at Holocaust memorials ‘Le olam lo, Le Olam al tishkach’.  ‘Never again, Always remember.’  In my life and work I’ve seen too many agains, again and again.  Thus those two Hebrew words ring hollow.  But Le olam al tishkach—never forget, always remember—to me is about Bearing Witness.  That is my need, my pain and my journey, and I have found voice to do so through writing, in words and pictures and music, and mostly in stories.

SG: It is what we do as artists – bear witness so that we don’t forget and always remember. One of the most prevalent themes in the novel is that of naming and identity. Without revealing or spoiling any plotlines, it is clear from the outset in the very arresting Prelude: Trisagion: Hymn of Prayer and Remembrance that this theme ties into memory and place:

He looks at them, the old woman, the young woman. He does not know their names. He does not know why this place […] reflected there are notes that play out his life, his name, which he cannot remember, who he is, which he cannot remember […] his hands drop sharply, slightly, his palms raised as if holding up the sky, holding perhaps time itself…

I’m perhaps merging questions here but it strikes me that the lyrical and – at times bodily – writing interspersed through the book pushes the reader to experience disconnect, as the characters do in each of the narratives. The role of memory is tied to the thread of investigation that ties all three generations together. Can you comment on this?  

GD: ‘Hania’ tells the story of three personal journeys as my three primary characters try to find, understand and accept self.  Each of these characters is indeed disconnected—from their personal histories, their political histories.  In order to find self they do indeed literally and figuratively investigate the past as the present, and their role in particular times and places.  Often history is seen as something separate, other.  The past disconnected.  But such is not disconnected.  I was struck that as Queen Elizabeth was buried and the tens of thousands waited to pass by her lying in state, when asked many said they were there to ‘be a part of history’, as if history is other.  But we are history, living it every day, a part of who and what we are.  In order to understand and define the present, we must define ourselves through the past.  My characters have many names, many identities.  Each of the three primary characters have their names changed by history, by necessity.  But to find who they are, they must journey into that personal and political past to define the parameters of self.  At one point a character warns another:  it is not the name that matters, it is what is within one’s heart.  And there lies memory:  to discover identity is a journey, and at times an investigation, not into name, but into the universe of what is within one’s heart.  Kant called it the ‘Moral Imperative’.  I would argue that each of these characters must find the imperative of who they are, which is indeed a moral question, seeking through memory the past, to give license not just to the present, but to the future.  Memory is something not just ‘outside’ us, it is within. 

It’s worth adding another story.  I went on my own to visit Treblinka.  Now Treblinka, unlike many other camps, was completely destroyed by the Nazis.  Nothing remained.  On the extermination site is a beautiful monument of hundreds of rough, standing stones of different sizes, some with the names of every village, town and city where the victims came from engraved.  The vast site is surrounded completely by forest; a monument of ‘train track ties’ in concrete leads up to it.  It’s not an easy place to get to unless you take a tour.  Most do. I went alone.  I arrived early, walked the kilometre to the site, and found myself in the vast, painful place completely, utterly alone for three hours, until I left. There amidst the ghosts and the breeze I found memory, and silence, where the quiet whispers of wind through pine trees brought me forward and back.  The song of tears.  Being alone mattered, and in that silence I found that that disconnect I also felt, and feel that, through memory, I could also embrace the stories I needed to tell.  I should add that I have been an expat for more of my life than not, far away from a large family, an exile.  Indeed I argue often that I am in exile.  The writer Thomas Wolfe wrote ‘you can’t go home again’.  You can’t, but all my life I have been metaphorically trying to do so.  The disconnect you mention is incredibly prevalent in my Voice.  In ‘Hania’ the characters too are seeking to find their way home.  …. You have to read the book to know if, arguably, they do… and how.

SG: That sounds like it was a transformational experience for you, Greg. The other weighty element to the novel (for this reader anyhow!) was that of communication. Silence, speech, music, performance – and acting in all the senses – are what your characters do to survive. These ways of being cross into creative practices and then are echoed in the form of this novel. Can you talk about how these reveal or cover truths of who we are, what we have done, and who we might become?

GD: I spoke above of the importance of Voice, of ‘art’ within defining us. To find expression through the arts helps therefore to define us as individuals, becomes identity itself. 

I will tell another story.  It is what I do.  I also spent time at Auschwitz.  I rather hated Auschwitz—a long discussion for another time.  And as I’d done much research into Auschwitz, there was little I hadn’t already known.  Auschwitz in fact consists of two primary camps—Auschwitz I and Auschwitz II that we call Birkenau, as well as many satellite camps.  As we moved around there was one thing the woman guide said on three occasions that really hit me, hard, although I’m not sure the others in my group, the many tourists, registered it in the same way.  The guide said:  in the camps here, 1.3 Million people died, 900,000 of whom were Jews.  Now it took at least two hours for the remains of a person to become ash in the crematoria.  The numbers don’t add up.  1.3 Million, a huge number of remains the Nazis sought to hide.  It’s a lot of ash, she said.  A huge amount.  So the Nazis scattered ash not only everywhere in this valley, they dumped it in rivers, lakes, forests…everywhere.  But of course, ash doesn’t disappear.  It seeps into the ground but it is there in the soil. 

So realize, she said, the dust is still here.  Even today.  You are breathing in the dust.  You are breathing in the dead…

I would take that further.  I would say one breathes in the dead not just in Auschwitz, or Treblinka, or the camps, or Warsaw, or Poland, or Central Europe—one metaphorically breathes in the dead in Western Europe, here in Ireland, in the US, everywhere.  Because the dead are within us.  Always within us.  Their tears are our tears.  Their laments, our laments.  Their requiems sing for us as well as them.

Thus the role, my role, is to use the arts, just as the characters in ‘Hania’ do, to come face to face with the dust of those we inhale, the dust locked in our hearts and memories. To understand past and who we are in relation to that past. It is the role of this story, the true responsibility of all stories, music, art to give us our common humanity and to express what is deep within us, including the past, in order to understand who we are.  We Bear Witness to the events of the past, and indeed the present, and find ways to cry out that common humanity.  For me, for the characters, such acts of expression are a rejection of the violence of the past, and an understanding of it.  Expression allows my characters to survive, and me to survive.  What is being expressed is the dust of the dead, to remind us that we have survived, and that we will struggle forever to do so. 

SG: And if we take that further, the ashes – once living – keep memories, and these memories are like the tears and the laments that you describe. This is an epic novel with the geneses inspired by real events. Are you interested in returning to any of the characters – and here I’m thinking of Aga? Or indeed, any of the themes?

GD: I had hoped when finishing ‘A Requiem For Hania’, I would exorcise many ghosts and thus move on to other stories, other obsessions.  But I’ve found I cannot so easily do so.  I’m therefore picking up some of the characters in ‘Hania’, some of the minor or referred to characters, and travelling with them further.  I don’t want to return to the Holocaust period per se, and indeed want to move now somewhat in a more contemporary world.  But I’m not ready to let them go, by necessity.  I’ve two books in mind further and they are what I’m now beginning to work on—not in quite the same way, or the same time period, but continuing still.  As for themes—I find in forty years of writing work that I return to the same themes in different guises over and over:  identity, Bearing Witness, the ‘grey zone’ between that which is dark and that which is light within an individual, how “art” gives us our desperate humanity, and of course trying to find one’s way home.  I don’t expect to leave these themes now.  They just become manifest in different ways.

SG: As with so many artists – we have our obsessions, our questions to ask! So, to finish up, Greg, some fun questions

  • Live or recorded concert? Music, like theatre or dance, is not static.  But a recorded version of such suggests it is.  So always live because there is always a sense of the unknown and discovery—whether it’s improv jazz, or watching Elvis’s moves, a Bruce Springsteen marathon or the slightest differences in performances of Mahler or Bach depending on the conductor.   In a communal audience you too are performer, you too are artist.
  • Tea or Coffee? Tea.  A surprising answer for one who is usually found on Ryanair flights hand carrying bags of deep roasted coffee beans of different countries from my favourite Soho Coffee distributor.  However—I am drawn to the memories of many drives from London to Portlaoise with my then small sons in the car.  When we’d arrive, my mother-in-law would always say sit down, have a quiet cup of tea.  Take a breath.  And while coffee gives me a needed morning burst of life, tea blesses me with silence, with thoughts, with harmonies, with reflection. 
  • Mountains or sea? I love both and both speak to me, but I grew up in the mountains of Colorado.  Mountains whisper their near silent thoughts and sing in voices that I understand.  The sea draws you in and casts you out.  Mountains however sing of the possible.  And as I said above, I’m trying to get home again and know I’ll never be able to get there.  But mountains, for me, are memory.
  • What’s next on your reading pile? I just finished Colum McCann’s ‘Apeirogon’.  Absolutely required reading.   Brilliant.  I’m now reading Janine di Giovanni’s ‘Madness Visible’ about the Balkans.  Janine is a wonderful journalist who helped me out a long time ago and along with others is responsible for the road I now travel.  She showed me tragedy and great pain, but showed me that I need to bear witness to events.  And to remember…. After that I’m anxious to start Cormac McCarthy’s new novel, and after Barbara Kingsolver’s, both magnificent writers, both books on my bedside table.
  • What are you working on or thinking about now? The film/television rights to ‘Hania’ have been optioned and while I have said I don’t think I should write for it, I am thinking about what the director we’re now hoping to attach might bring to it.  A composer/pianist also contacted me about the stage rights and I’m interested to see what she’ll do.  I’ve put it to her that perhaps she could look at some piano recitals in Europe in a year’s time, performing some works referenced in the book,–Bach, Chopin, Penderecki– along with something new, interspersed with some very short readings from the book, I hope both in English and Polish.  I dream of things such as that.  Then after the New Year I’ll begin the slow process of developing the two books I want to do spinning both from and away from ‘Hania’.  I hope to spend time in Krakow next year, also Lviv and Kyiv, and Jerusalem, as I research and develop these two long term projects.  ‘A Requiem For Hania’ took almost eight years to produce.  I’m hoping these two other projects might take less time, but …. But.

Very exciting to hear that the film/TV rights have been optioned. I look forward to hearing how it all goes and also to the new projects. I spent a very short time in Krakow and loved it, a beautiful city and most welcoming people. Thank you, Greg, for such open answers and insight into your thinking, intention, and hopes for A Requiem for Hania.

Photograph of Greg Dinner wearing a blue shirt and wool coat against a background of trees and green leaves with sun shining. Photograph courtesy of the author.

A Requiem for Hania can be purchased from independent booksellers such as Kennys, O’Mahoneys or international sellers such as Amazon or Waterstones

Writers Chat 59: Maureen Gallagher on “Limbo” (Poolbeg Crimson: Dublin, 2022)

Maureen, You are very welcome to my WRITERS CHAT series. Congratulations on your debut novel Limbo: A Kate Frances Mystery (Poolbeg Crimson: Dublin, 2022).

It’s a real page-turner of a thriller that reminds us of how far we’ve come in terms of equality and bodily autonomy but also how far the reality has still to go.

Cover of Limbo featuring seascape and sand dunes with an abandoned pair of child’s boots. This photograph is of Port Arthur in Gweedore, taken by Peter Trant.

Limbo is the first in a series featuring the brilliantly complicated and humanly flawed Detective Kate Francis whom we get to know as Frankie. Tell me about the cover, the title and the series.

MG: Thank you very much for inviting me to WRITERS CHAT, Shauna. The front cover image of Limbo depicts the dunes at Port Arthur strand in northwest Donegal – marram grass and patches of bright sand in the foreground with a view out to sea and the islands in the distance. The image was taken by my brother-in-law – Peter Trant – an accomplished photographer, who is very familiar with the beaches in Gweedore, and took many photographs of the dunes for me to choose from.  The final image is enhanced by David Prendergast, Poolbeg’s designer, who darkened the sky, and skilfully coated the entire landscape with a thrilling orange hue. When it came to choosing a title, Limbo came to me pretty easily, for the layers of meaning that inhabit the word, not least the state of babies souls and the fact that Roche can’t give them a Christian burial. In addition,  Frankie’s indecision and paralysis about what she wants out of life career or family is an important aspect in the novel. The title is also in tune with the tone of the book, which is an attempt to imbue the story with a whiff of incense, given the dominance of the Catholic Church at that time. Limbo is a the first of three. My plan is to set the series at ten-year intervals, so that it charts Frankie’s growth and development personally and professionally, and also gives some idea of the way Ireland has changed in the past 35 years. 

SG: Very interesting to hear about the ten-year intervals. I love that idea and because I really liked Frankie who is very much of her time but is also an everywoman, can you talk about how Frankie developed both as protagonist and character within the framework of the storyline?  

MG: Detective Kate Francis aka Frankie works in a male dominated workplace in  nineteen eighties Ireland. Sexism is rife. In the very first paragraph, sergeant Brannigan, ruminates:

‘To think, godammit, the reinforcements they’re sending from the city, includes a woman. A battle-axe, no doubt, built like a barn.’

So from very early on, we see Frankie dealing with the hostility of Brannigan, while at the same time fending off the unwanted attentions of her married boss, and trying to placate her boyfriend, resentful at her long hours at work. As she struggles to advance the investigation, these personal challenges deepen. Her boyfriend asks her: What do you want out of life? To be the best sleuth? To settle down and become a mother? Frankie is conflicted. She doesn’t see why she can’t do both. When she’s left to solve the case on her own, we see Frankie’s professional confidence grow, as she stands up to the corrupt sergeant and follows her own instinct for finding the killer. Alongside this confidence comes an insight into how she will address the apparent contradictions in her life. In the end we see a changed Frankie, one who has grown personally over the course of solving the murder, and who is grounded and at peace with herself.

SG:  Limbo is set in 1989 in Donegal, with the stunning landscape key to both the mystery and the reading experience. Your descriptions are beautiful and even more impactful as they are set against the investigation of two murdered babies, from Port Arthur Strand, Gweedore to Errigal Mountain and the River Claddy is “the warm colour of tea”, “On the horizon, Frankie can see the islands floating in the Atlantic, surrounded by thousands of foaming white horses fringing the waves: Gola, Inishmaan, Inisheer.” How important was the setting to the novel and to the series?

MG: I spent most summers as a child in Gweedore in Donegal, where my parents grew up. My father taught in Ranafast, and the family simply decamped to the Gaeltacht for July and August. So many images from childhood mean Gweedore to me: Errigal mountain, salmon fishing, snuff, the bitter winter I spent there with its howling storms; sea and sand and picnics on the strand. Summer seemed to go on forever back then and we spent much of it in one or other of the three glorious beaches, including Port Arthur, which features prominently in the novel. I was fascinated with juxtaposing a horrible crime like the murder of a baby against a backdrop of such exquisite beauty. The idea for the novel came from an assignment at a workshop to write a 300-wordpitch for a crime thriller. The writer,  John Fowles, once said that he usually started with a powerful image, and then tried to work out what the story behind it was and how it developed, The French Lieutenant’s Woman being the most obvious example. The image of the mysterious woman at the coast staring out to sea is not so far away from the image of a baby found on the beach. So my novel opens with the most awful crime imaginable. Just as south eastern Sicily is like a character in Andrea Camilleri’s Montelbano thrillers, I wanted Gweedore to feature almost as a character in the story, with the mountain Errigal a touchstone for everything.

SG: Lovely to hear your authorial intention, Maureen, and I do think that comes through to the reader. Over the course of the investigation, Frankie realises how the patriarchal systems of power are skewed towards men, from the hospitals – early on in Limbo a matron exclaims, as if there were no men involved in procreation “these young girls, you’d feel so sorry for them” – to the force which employs her as a detective – she figures out which battles to fight with Brannigan, how to negotiate her desire with Moran (“there’ll be none of that she tells herself”) and her future, whatever that might be, with Rory. Can you talk about your exploration of gender in the Ireland of 1989?

MG: The action takes place in 1989, ten years after the pope’s visit, an era when people’s mindset had not changed much at all from the 50’s and 60’s. I wanted to explore what we were like as an nation back then, and ultimately what that led to: women vilified for no greater crime than becoming pregnant. At one point the protagonist, Frankie, asks: “Do we not value pregnancy and birth in this country?” So you could say my focus was the treatment of women in late 20th century Ireland. When it came to naming my female protagonist, I had to think long and hard. My main reason for giving my female character a name that is somewhat androgynous was because I didn’t want her to be referred to by her first name while all the men in Limbo were referred to by their surnames – Moran, Brannigan, O’Toole etc. I felt that would have rendered her somewhat inferior, in a situation where she is already facing prejudice. But neither did I want to distance her from the reader. So I set about finding a surname that sounded like a first name. Even though there are female Frankie’s, there is the intentional false assumption that Frankie is a male name. At the very least it is gender neutral, androgynous. My intention was to give my protagonist a modicum of gravitas in a male world.

SG: And Frankie as a name for this character works so well. So, part of Frankie’s initial investigations lead her to Umfin Island to meet with members of followers of the Brigid, Goddess of Fertility. She finds

“she’s conflicted. On the one hand, she’s impressed with the back-to-nature self-sufficient element of the lifestyle she’s observed….on the other, at the very least there was a level of violence in the ritual she’s just witnessed that was disturbing.”

In a way, this experience also sums up Frankie’s view of Irish society and politics, and the power of the Catholic Church. It appears to be one thing but actually – including and especially figures in authority – is another. Can you talk about how these themes influenced the story line (or was it vice-versa?).

MG: What was an eye-opener for me when I started to write Limbo, was that the structure of the crime novel – you could say its limitation – allowed me to explore social issues, something dear to my heart. The very nature of the genre frees up the imagination. The two underlying themes I had in mind when starting the novel, was the power of the Catholic Church in Irish society and the subordinate position of women. Someone once coined the phrase ‘the Catholic Taliban’, to describe the hold the Catholic Church had on the lives of women in Ireland all down the century since independence. Throughout the thirties, forties and fifties, and even up to the eighties women’s bodies were a battleground. I wanted to show how the Catholic Church dominated the whole narrative, how it was woven into the very fabric of society, and for this to inform the tone of Limbo. The backdrop to the story is a misogynistic state hand in glove with a powerful church and its impact on women. But I was conscious too that exploring social context should not mean long passages of exposition. The bottom line is that the novel has to be entertaining – people want to know what happens next.  Crime writing, like all fictional writing, is best done through scene setting, dialogue, believable characterisation. Or as the late great John McGahern would say, told slant.  

SG: Yes indeed – ‘told slant’ – a lesson in writing fiction! Lastly, in Limbo, as in our history, those who don’t confirm to prescribed behaviours and identities are locked up or hide themselves away – claiming their voice as their own by not speaking, for example Hannah. Part of what Frankie has to do is to listen to what is behind the stories that people tell, see what is beyond the land and within the houses. In this way, as Frankie “feels resentful at how the Church has commandeered all the major events in people’s lives”, Limbo is as much about agency and power as it about a thrilling story. Was this your intention?  

MG: Limbo is very much about the struggle women have to gain autonomy within the suffocating limitations imposed on them. Hannah’s response to the violent strictures visited on her is to choose not to speak, to metaphorically lock herself away. Her daughter Sarah, in contrast, determinedly manages to rise above her awful experiences and leaves Ireland to embrace a new life. Frankie addresses head-on the challenges she faces and in so doing gains insight into her own personal predicament and how to resolve it. The novel is very much about agency and power. It charts both the tragic predicament of the women who are crushed by their oppression, but also the empowerment and joy of the women who transcend it.

SG: To finish up, Maureen, some fun questions

  • Sandy or Stony Beach?  Sandy. Definitely not stony – I value my ankles!
  • Tea or Coffee? Mostly tea. But when my daughter – who now lives in Spain – visits, I bring her to Tigh Neachtain in Galway, which serves an excellent coffee.
  • Music or quiet when writing? I love music but not when I’m writing. I like total silence when I’m writing.
  • What’s next on your reading pile? I’m re-reading of Lajos Egri’s superb The Art of Dramatic Writing as research for Book 2, and for leisure reading I’ve started Maggie O’Farrell’s The Marriage Portrait, which I’m enjoying very much.
  • What are you working on or thinking about now? Now that the launch of Limbo is behind me, I’m picking up where I left off on Book 2 in early summer. The book’s premise is ‘Misogyny Fuels Femicide’, an idea I’m very engaged with and I can’t wait to get stuck back in.

Thank you, Maureen, for such engaging and thorough answers. I very much look forward to the next two books in the series and to seeing more of Frankie!

Readers can order Limbo here

Author Maureen Gallagher. Photo courtesy of author.

With thanks also to Poolbeg Crimson for the advance copy of Limbo

Writers Chat 57: Richard Fulco on “We Are All Together” (Wampus: 2022)

Front cover of We Are All Together showing a black and white sketch of a stage with instruments lined up against a stool, waiting to be played.

SG: Richard, Welcome to my Writers Chat series. Congratulations on your second novel, We Are All Together which comes out this November 2022 with Wampus. Let’s start with the cover. As We Are All Together is so person-centric, I’m curious about the cover which is a black and white sketch of the various instruments (literally) of We Are All Together. What message/s did you want to convey with this, and how much input did you have, working with Wampus, into the cover design?

RF: One reason I love working with Wampus is that its founder and creative director Mark Doyon provides me with ample feedback on everything from marketing to editing. Ultimately, Wampus leaves the decision-making up to its artists, so I am eternally grateful for the creative freedom that I have.

The cover art was created by my brilliant partner, the painter Nan Ring. She and I discussed the concept. I wanted something fairly cynical yet simple. The bare stage: a guitar, amplifier, microphone and stool. But where are the musicians? Nan and I wanted the cover art to start a conversation. We wanted to pose several questions considering the title of the book.

The Beatles have been an enormous presence on me as a writer and on this particular novel. The book’s title is from “I Am the Walrus.” “I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.” The title claims, “We are all together” but in fact, the characters are not all together at the beginning of the book. In the United States, we are not united, never was, and yet we are inextricably linked nevertheless. I don’t think the irony will be lost on readers.

In addition, the edges of the image dissolve, indicating the ephemeral nature of life and art. Even as we are here together, we are all slowly leaving this world, which makes the present moment all the more intensely poignant and beautiful.

SG: Thank you for that explanation – it’s interesting to hear the story and conversations behind the cover and title. Leading on from this, it seems that We Are All Together could not have been set in any other era and any other country than the 1960s New York (and other cities).  Was the era – and all the conflicts of national and individual identity – what brought you to this story?

RF: Syd Barrett and The Pink Floyd brought me to the story and the recent politics in America provided me with a blueprint.

It began as a rock and roll novel about a young musician so desperate to make it that he’s willing to do anything, even betray his best friend. I drew upon my experiences as a desperate musician, living the life of a starving artist, doubting my abilities, and unwilling to face the truth about my artistic pursuits.

For several years, I wrote about music on my blog, Riffraf. I had the opportunity to interview the great rock photographer Mick Rock who had taken some of the most iconic photos in rock and roll: David Bowie and Mick Ronson, Iggy Pop, Lou Reed and of course Syd Barrett. Syd’s story was a compelling yet strange one, and Mr. Rock shared his experiences with Syd that really piqued my interest. At the height of his musical powers, Syd just checked out. Was he an acid casualty? Was it mental illness? Or did he no longer wish to make music with the band he formed?

David Gilmour said, “Syd’s story is a sad story, romanticized by people who don’t know anything about it. They’ve made it fashionable, but it’s just not that way.” I am by no means trying to romanticize Syd’s story. Although I’ve included some of Pink Floyd’s mythology and lore. My novel resembled Syd’s story in the beginning, but eventually morphed into something more socio-political than I had anticipated. I owe a great debt to the American politics of the past decade.

SG: I thought you captured the public/private self well alright. Stephen is constantly trying to please those around him – on stage, at parties and even when he is supposed to be engrossed in his music he steps out of his reality to remember, for example, seeing the Beatles on TV. Stephen’s journey – and that of the reader – is about using others to find or create himself. Would you class this novel as a coming-of-age tale, a bildungsroman? Or is it more of a morality tale about vanity? Or does it belong to a genre at all?

RF: Whereas my first book, THERE IS NO END TO THIS SLOPE, is a coming-of-middle-age novel, this one is a more traditional bildungsroman. The novel’s protagonist, Stephen Cane, is a naive twenty-one-year old narcissist who is wrestling with his parents’ mixed messages, dreams, vocation and the belief that he is not a truly great man.

Stephen and his partner and friend, Dylan John, are young men on their own individual psychological, spiritual and moral journeys. Dylan travels in one direction as a civil rights activist, while Stephen, on a separate path, pursues his love for rock and roll. WE ARE ALL TOGETHER is also a buddy novel and a road novel. There’s even a touch of historical fiction and perhaps some thriller/mystery elements tossed in for good measure.

I suppose there are moral questions posed, but I don’t think of the novel as a morality play. At what lengths would you go to gain success? What role does the artist play in this world? Does the world need another rock star? Now that I think about it, Dylan is kind of like Everyman who is trying to justify his time on the earth.

SG: Yes, there is a touch of Dylan as the seer, and also the Everyman. While We Are All Together is, on a top level, an exploration of the lure of fame, and perhaps a commentary on a capitalist society – “My old man had been instructing me ever since I was a boy that whenever money was involved, I should seize the opportunity, no matter who gets shredded in the process, even if that person ultimately turns out to be me….” – it also sets its gaze at parent/child relationships in the formation of “character”, and “reinvention”. Early in the novel, we’re told:

“Some mothers inspire their children to aspire to greatness, to reach for the stars, like Arthur’s mother. But my mother, who was kind of musical in her own way, singing in the church choir and all, encouraged me to play it safe…the world ‘dream’ just wasn’t in her vocabulary.”

To what extent do you think Stephen’s strict religious moral upbringing with a focus on money making, is related to his constant misjudging what is expected of him in the relationships he tries to forge? I’m thinking here of the complex relationship with Emily, and then later with her as Gentle Wind (who, perhaps accurately, claims he has “never loved anyone” in his life).

RF: I’m not sure that Stephen misjudges Emily (also known as Gentle Wind). He witnesses her prejudice and bigotry on their first night together when she makes an anti-semitic remark. I think Stephen chooses to overlook Emily’s questionable, reprehensible behavior because she’s not only beautiful, but she’s also a terrific artist. He’s a young, lonely loser who just had his heart broken and is desperate in both art and love. He’s seeking the love, attention and approval that his parents failed to provide. Stephen is truly impressed with Emily’s natural talent. Wondering if he possesses greatness himself, Stephen wants to be near greatness, hoping that maybe some of Emily’s will rub off on him.

SG: I was thinking not that he misjudges her but that he misjudges the relationship. This desire to be near greatness, as you say, is also why he has John as a friend. You make great use of description, colour, and visuals to capture the clothes, atmosphere and attitudes of 1967, or the Summer of Love. From Emily’s “ratty dungarees with holes in both knees”, “yellow button down with a wide collar and large bright silver buttons”, to the “purple stairs” which Stephen and Emily descend, and a projection of a montage of “films of suburban families opening presents in front of a Christmas tree, psychedelic mushroom swirls, the conflict that was heating up in Vietnam, and police officers beating negroes with Billy clubs.” Or later the band is

“decked out in black and wearing dark shades… stunning female back-up singer, a blonde mannequin in a white leisure suit and black scarf”.

It strikes me that We Are All Together is very filmic. Could you see it as a film – or a play, given your playwriting background?

RF: I never envisioned this book as a play. Though I do think there is some fairly decent dialogue within. When I write a play, I accept the stage as my biggest challenge. I love writing dialogue, but I also consider ways to tell my story visually? Writing a novel is quite different. And for this book I attempted to write a more traditional, linear tale, but I wanted to go really big with its visuals. Let’s include a chapter with Andy Warhol and the Factory. Why not take a trip across America? I like Pete Townshend, so let’s make him a character. My vision was broad and ranging. I saw the narrative quite clearly. The Sixties provided me with color, extraordinary political events, and powerful images, so I’ve tried my best to preserve them in prose.

SG: Yes, you’re right about the vision – and it’s quite a journey you bring the reader on. We Are All Together also explores the expanding, changing world of music (and touches on the art and film world with Warhol making multiple appearances) in the 1960s, and shows the reader – through Stephen – how closely it was linked to political change. How important was it for you to track socio-political change and in doing so, echo tensions and polarisation in America of today?

RF: When I embarked on this project, my intention was to recall some of my experiences as a singer in a rock and roll band in the 80s and 90s. I set it during the Summer of Love because I wanted the protagonist to be somewhat of a precursor to punk, someone outside the mainstream. But early on it was clear to me that the character I thought was the book’s protagonist, Dylan John, was really the protagonist’s (Stephen Cane) foil.

The more research I did on the Summer of Love the more I learned about The Long, Hot Summer where more than 150 riots had taken place across America, the most notable rebellions were in Detroit and Newark.

As a white writer, I discovered that there were two narratives in the summer of ‘67. The white narrative of The Summer of Love – peace, love, and understanding, is more mainstream, while the black narrative of racial injustice, discord and the quest for equality takes a back seat.

I’m ashamed to say that I really didn’t know too much about the Long, Hot Summer until I began writing this novel. The more I wrote, the more invested I had become. Dylan John questions his role in society and decides to join the fight for civil rights. He doesn’t think the world needs another rock star. He believes the world needs soldiers in the fight for justice.

I created two narratives that parallel the socio-political events of the time. There is Stephen Cane’s story – The Summer of Love – and then there’s Dylan John’s story, The Long, Hot Summer. It was a very conscious dichotomy. While I was writing the book, America was in turmoil, mimicking the events of 1967. WE ARE ALL TOGETHER is set during the Summer of 1967, but I’m really commenting on present day America.

SG: That duality and commentary comes across really strongly, Richard. It really speaks of how our own situation as writers and the when/where we are writing from seems into our narratives. Stephen and Dylan John/Arthur Devane are polarised characters in this respect and your use of dialogue worked well in this respect. Can you talk about the relationship between Dylan John and Stephen Cane and how this asks questions about the role of the artist in society – is it to provoke? Create change? Make money? Do something “meaningful”, as Dylan says?

RF: We Are All Together addresses a nation struggling with its mythological past and the effects it has had on the integrity of the individual. Does the artist owe the world anything? Does the ailing world need another rock star? The role of the artist is to comment on the world. The artist seeks truth. The artist tries to make sense of this perplexing world. If the art is truthful it might offer a fresh point of view for the audience (or reader).

SG: Questions that are timeless. But was it difficult to incorporate real musicians and bands (The Beatles, The Velvet Underground, Mamas and Papas etc) into the fictional world of We Are All Together whilst maintaining the integrity of Stephen’s story?

RF: It was actually quite fun. I particularly enjoyed writing about George Harrison. I wanted to write about the time George was in Haight-Ashbury and how disappointed he was in the flower power counterculture. And there is Stephen Cane in the midst of it all, pleading with George to listen to the only song he has ever written.

The infamous story is that George and his wife Patti visited the Haight on August 8, 1967, but were really turned off by the culture. In his biography Dark Horse, Harrison said, “Somehow I expected them to all own their own little shops. I expected them all to be nice and clean and friendly and happy.” Instead, he said, he found the hippies “hideous, spotty little teenagers.”

SG: Again, it’s that duality – perception/ expectation/ reality. Part of Stephen’s journey is also experimenting with various class A drugs, especially heroin “his papa” which eases his guilt at

“Failing to protect my mother when my father went to town on her with his black belt and wide silver buckle. Breaking up Ghost Spider. Replacing Dylan in Red Afternoon. Sleeping with my best friend’s wife”.

There are times when our sympathy for Stephen wanes. But you pull us back with humour and bizarre horror, such as The Jolly Jokesters on their magic bus, Furthermore which bring both reader and Stephen out of his self-obsession and back into the reality of a divided society. Can you comment on the humour in the novel?

RF: I wouldn’t say WE ARE ALL TOGETHER is a particularly hilarious novel. One might find the hapless Stephen Cane somewhat amusing. Certainly Tony Campbell, the writer and entrepreneur, might make one smile. Neal Cassady has his moments too. Though even in the dark there is light. Mark Twain said, “The secret source of humor itself is not joy but sorrow. There is no humor in heaven.” Whenever I’m writing I search for the humor in the tragic. I’ve written a number of tragicomedy one-act plays, and I approach all of my writing with some levity. You can’t write from inside a casket all the time, right?

SG: Exactly! So, lastly, Richard, let’s conclude our Writers Chat session with some fun questions:

  • If you could be a character in your novel, who would it be? Clementine. She is a poet, a lover, a traveller, a wandering spirit, an adventurer, a good friend.
  • What song from We Are All Together would be its soundtrack? “Arnold Layne” by Pink Floyd influenced the psychedelic songs written by Dylan John, Red Afternoon and even Stephen Cane’s one song.
  • Silence or noise when writing? Noise while writing. Silence while editing.
  • Favourite band doing the circuit today? Wilco.
  • What is the most surprising read you’ve had this year? The Talented Mr. Ripley and Oh William! 
Photograph of smiling Richard Fulco wearing black-rimmed glasses and a navy-blue shirt, against a background of a lake and forests.

Purchase We Are All Together at Barnes and Noble, Amazon or AppleBooks

Learn more about Richard Fulco at Wampus.

With thanks to Richard Fulco and Wampus for an advance copy of We Are All Together.